Slugfester

From a creator to a personal God: debates and analysis

Creator-only (deistic) arguments and the further step to a personal, involved God. These debates test whether a creator, designer, or ultimate foundation also warrants claims about divine goodness, providence, revelation, or intervention. This describes the arguments, not the speakers' religious identities. Explore the published debate assessments, arguments and original sources.

About this topic

Creator-only (deistic) arguments and the further step to a personal, involved God. These debates test whether a creator, designer, or ultimate foundation also warrants claims about divine goodness, providence, revelation, or intervention. This describes the arguments, not the speakers' religious identities.

Debates are grouped by their main question. Scores assess the reasoning presented, not the truth of a position. Read the assessment method.

Explore the assessments

Does God Exist? Trent Horn vs. Ben Watkins · 2021

Horn argued from a first actualizer, finite past, divine attributes, and moral value; Watkins countered with sustaining-causation objections, naturalism’s simpler prior, evolutionary evil, hiddenness, and secular moral realism.

Trent Horn: 71 · Ben Watkins: 75. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.

Michael Huemer vs Joshua Rasmussen: Does God Exist? · 2026

Rasmussen advances a cumulative explanatory case for God, while Huemer presses competing finite-creator, multiverse, infinity, and evidential suffering objections.

Josh Rasmussen: 77 · Michael Huemer: 79. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.

Michael Egnor vs Matt Dillahunty: Does God Exist? · 2021

Egnor developed cumulative Thomistic, natural-order, and moral arguments, while Dillahunty more effectively defended evidential restraint and exposed unsupported transitions to God.

Michael Egnor: 71 · Matt Dillahunty: 83. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.