Published debate record
6 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 87.3/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
Joe Schmid vs Chris Tomaszewski: Is Divine Simplicity True? · 2020
Schmid presses simplicity through composition, Trinitarian asymmetry, and contingent knowledge; Tomaszewski answers through aseity, analogical predication, subsistent relations, and extrinsic differentiation.
Chris Tomaszewski: 86 · Joe Schmid: 87. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Josh Rasmussen vs Joe Schmid: The Argument from Limits · 2023
Rasmussen develops arbitrary limits into qualified perfection; Schmid’s holistic, axiological, symmetry, and necessity objections leave the God-like conclusion substantially underdetermined.
Josh Rasmussen: 84 · Joe Schmid: 90. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Divine Hiddenness and Religious Evidence: Joe Schmid vs. Dan Paterson · 2026
Schmid won by arguing that nonculpable nonbelief, demographic clustering, and silence amid tragedy fit naturalism better, while Paterson's temporary-redemption defenses remained comparatively under-supported.
Joe Schmid: 88 · Dan Paterson: 83. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Michael Jones vs Joseph Schmid: Does the Contingency Argument Support God? · 2022
Schmid won by fourteen points because his focused underdetermination objections repeatedly exposed unsupported transitions in Jones’s ambitious, wide-ranging explanatory case.
Michael Jones: 73 · Joseph Schmid: 87. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Gregory Pine vs Joseph Schmid: Is Divine Simplicity True? · 2021
Pine develops a coherent classical framework, but Schmid more effectively isolates missing causal bridges and unresolved differences between necessary divinity and contingent knowledge.
Gregory Pine: 75 · Joseph Schmid: 87. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Christopher Tomaszewski vs Joe Schmid: Classical Theism and Monotheism · 2020
Joe more effectively exposes gaps in the uniqueness arguments; Christopher clarifies conceptual existence and extrinsic predication, with both sides leaving substantive explanatory questions open.
Christopher Tomaszewski: 82 · Joe Schmid: 85. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Team and other excluded appearances
These records do not contribute to individual averages.
Trent Horn and Cameron Bertuzzi vs Alex O'Connor and Joe Schmid: Problem of Evil · 2022
Horn and Bertuzzi defend theodicy and Christian hope; O'Connor and Schmid press evidential evil, animal suffering, and the cost of skeptical replies.
Trent Horn and Cameron Bertuzzi: 78 · Alex O'Connor and Joe Schmid: 84. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.