Published debate record
5 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 78/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
Richard Swinburne vs Graham Oppy: Is Theism Probable? · 2022
Swinburne advances a cumulative theistic explanation, while Oppy answers with economical naturalistic alternatives and sharper comparative, anthropocentric, consciousness, and modal challenges.
Richard Swinburne: 80 · Graham Oppy: 85. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Richard Swinburne vs Michael Huemer: Is Theism Coherent? · 2026
Swinburne defends coherent maximal attributes through logical possibility and doctrinal distinctions; Huemer presses quantitative infinity, residual knowledge, temporal conflict, and supertask objections.
Richard Swinburne: 75 · Michael Huemer: 83. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Richard Swinburne vs Peter Millican: Does God Exist? · 2022
Swinburne defended personal explanation, simplicity, freedom, and compensation; Millican pressed predictive specificity, scientific background, divine coherence, embodiment, and victim-centered suffering.
Richard Swinburne: 81 · Peter Millican: 88. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Richard Swinburne vs Philip Goff: What Best Explains Cosmic Purpose? · 2023
Goff wins by separating cosmic purpose from omnipotence and fitting suffering better, while Swinburne offers substantial design, freedom, compensation, and simplicity defenses.
Richard Swinburne: 76 · Philip Goff: 83. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Richard Swinburne vs Bart Ehrman — God and Suffering · 2009
Ehrman’s victim-centered, natural-evil, and scriptural challenges outweighed Swinburne’s coherent but incompletely warranted account of responsible freedom, sanctity, redemption, and heaven.
Richard Swinburne: 78 · Bart Ehrman: 85. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Team and other excluded appearances
These records do not contribute to individual averages.
Peter Singer, Jessica Frazier, Richard Swinburne, and Alex O'Connor: The Mystery of Morality · 2025
Singer, Frazier, and Swinburne offer divergent realist accounts of morality; O'Connor defends ethical emotivism and treats moral language as expressive rather than truth-apt.
Peter Singer, Jessica Frazier, Richard Swinburne: 82 · Alex O'Connor: 80. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.