Published debate record
5 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 84.6/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
Sean McDowell vs Paulogia — Apostolic Martyrdom and the Resurrection · 2020
McDowell argues costly apostolic persistence supports sincere resurrection belief, while Paulogia accepts key individuals but challenges group scope, death evidence, and the move from sincerity to truth.
Sean McDowell: 86 · Paulogia: 86. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Trent Horn vs Paulogia — Did the Apostles Die for a Lie? · 2023
Horn argues that documented and foreseeable suffering supports apostolic sincerity; Paulogia answers that evidence for several named leaders cannot establish all eleven.
Trent Horn: 86 · Paulogia: 87. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Mike Winger vs Paulogia — Evidence for the Resurrection · 2018
Mike Winger and Paulogia dispute whether early resurrection reports, appearances, persecution, and the empty tomb make Jesus’s resurrection the best historical explanation.
Mike Winger: 82 · Paulogia: 84. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Paulogia vs Michael Jones — Divine Hiddenness and a Perfectly Loving God · 2019
Paulogia narrowly wins through the one-exception burden and unequal disclosure, while Jones offers calibrated psychological, public-evidence, and postmortem compatibility replies.
Paulogia: 86 · Michael Jones: 83. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Jonathan McLatchie vs Paulogia — Christianity’s Origins and the Resurrection · 2023
McLatchie wins narrowly by offering the more developed comparative explanation, while Paulogia exposes serious unresolved dependence on Gospel proximity, transmission, and source-specific reliability.
Jonathan McLatchie: 83 · Paulogia: 80. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.