Published debate record
2 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 81/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
Mike Winger vs Matt Dillahunty: Is Belief in the Resurrection Unreasonable? · 2019
Winger builds a cumulative historical case for resurrection, while Dillahunty argues that transmitted reports and unresolved causal gaps justify withholding belief.
Mike Winger: 80 · Matt Dillahunty: 86. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Mike Winger vs Paulogia — Evidence for the Resurrection · 2018
Mike Winger and Paulogia dispute whether early resurrection reports, appearances, persecution, and the empty tomb make Jesus’s resurrection the best historical explanation.
Mike Winger: 82 · Paulogia: 84. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.