Published debate record
2 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 80/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
Matthew Adelstein vs Matt Dillahunty: Should We Believe in God? · 2025
Adelstein presented a cumulative Bayesian case for theism, while Dillahunty more consistently exposed underdetermined likelihoods, divine motives, and omnimax identification.
Matthew Adelstein: 81 · Matt Dillahunty: 89. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Matthew Adelstein vs Lance Bush: Moral Realism · 2021
Adelstein offers reflective and experiential evidence for realism; Bush more effectively challenges its interpretation, while both distinguish hypothetical consistency from harmful endorsement.
Matthew Adelstein: 79 · Lance Bush: 86. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.