Published debate record
1 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 81/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
Mike Huemer vs Matt Lutz: Is Morality Real? · 2026
Huemer defends objective morality through evaluative judgment and defeasible appearances; Lutz counters with desire-based reasons, projectivism, and explanationist standards for knowledge.
Michael Huemer: 88 · Matt Lutz: 81. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Team and other excluded appearances
These records do not contribute to individual averages.
David Enoch & Eric Sampson vs Don Loeb & Matthew Lutz: Is Moral Realism True? · 2024
Enoch and Sampson defend robust moral realism through Moorean cases and rational reflection; Loeb and Lutz argue that desire-relative reasons and a naturalistic explanation of moral experience make such facts unnecessary.
David Enoch & Eric Sampson: 92 · Don Loeb & Matthew Lutz: 91. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.