Published debate record
5 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 84.8/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
David Enoch vs Lance Bush: Are There Objective Moral Truths? · 2026
Enoch defends mind-independent normativity through justified appearances and comparative explanation; Bush contests realist priority through neutral language, causal genealogy, pragmatism, and parsimony.
David Enoch: 85 · Lance Bush: 84. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Michael Huemer vs Lance Bush: Do Objective Moral Facts Exist? · 2024
Huemer defended attitude-independent morality through semantic tests and intellectual appearances; Bush countered with contextual quietism, folk indeterminacy, and challenges to intuition’s public authority.
Michael Huemer: 85 · Lance Bush: 83. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Lance Bush vs Derek McAllister: Moral Anti-Realism vs Realism · 2025
Bush systematically challenges realist presumptions from common sense, history, and semantics, while McAllister offers competent but insufficiently documented convergence and perspectival-collapse arguments.
Lance Bush: 90 · Derek McAllister: 76. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Eric Sampson vs Lance Bush: Is Moral Realism True? · 2022
Sampson narrowly prevails by defining a limited realism and defending its intelligibility, while Bush supplies powerful underdetermination and genealogy challenges that remain evidentially incomplete.
Eric Sampson: 82 · Lance Bush: 81. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Matthew Adelstein vs Lance Bush: Moral Realism · 2021
Adelstein offers reflective and experiential evidence for realism; Bush more effectively challenges its interpretation, while both distinguish hypothetical consistency from harmful endorsement.
Matthew Adelstein: 79 · Lance Bush: 86. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.