Published debate record
6 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 86.2/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
Glen Scrivener vs Joe Folley: Morality, Evil, Consciousness, and Christian Narrative · 2025
Folley pressed cumulative evidential and methodological objections, while Scrivener offered an integrated Christian narrative whose strongest replies remained partly underdeveloped.
Glen Scrivener: 74 · Joe Folley: 84. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Jonathan Pageau vs Joe Folley: Genesis, Jesus, Science, and Faith · 2026
Pageau connected purposive patterns, scripture, resurrection, and worship to Logos; Folley consistently separated their usefulness and structural reality from supernatural conclusions.
Jonathan Pageau: 76 · Joe Folley: 88. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Nathan Hawkins vs Joe Folley: Do We Really Have Free Will? · 2026
Hawkins defended alternative-capable self-formation through constrained indeterminacy; Folley more consistently grounded practical agency and responsibility in distinctions surviving determinism.
Nathan Hawkins: 83 · Joe Folley: 89. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Nathan Hawkins vs Joe Folley: Free Will, Compatibilism, and Idealism · 2026
Hawkins defended libertarian idealism through normativity and experiential completeness, while Folley’s modal distinctions and disciplined pragmatism applied stronger comparative pressure.
Nathan Hawkins: 77 · Joe Folley: 85. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Philip Goff vs Joe Folley: Consciousness, Mystical Experience, and Fine-Tuning · 2026
Goff offers a unified consciousness-based worldview; Folley’s targeted challenges to extrapolation, mystical warrant, and cosmic probability produce the stronger overall evidential case.
Philip Goff: 81 · Joe Folley: 86. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Joe Folley vs Glen Scrivener: Goodness Without God · 2025
Folley more successfully separates historical influence from necessary grounding, while Scrivener offers substantive Christian interpretations without establishing their exclusivity against non-theistic alternatives.
Joe Folley: 85 · Glen Scrivener: 76. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Team and other excluded appearances
These records do not contribute to individual averages.
William Lane Craig, Jessica Frazier, Philip Goff, and Joe Folley: Did God Create Reality? · 2026
Craig defends classical Christian theism as the best explanation of reality and objective meaning; Frazier, Goff, and Folley press Hindu, mystical, and agnostic alternatives that complicate God, value, experience, and morality.
William Lane Craig: 80 · Jessica Frazier, Philip Goff, and Joe Folley: 82. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.