Published debate record
6 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 78.3/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
Glen Scrivener vs Joe Folley: Morality, Evil, Consciousness, and Christian Narrative · 2025
Folley pressed cumulative evidential and methodological objections, while Scrivener offered an integrated Christian narrative whose strongest replies remained partly underdeveloped.
Glen Scrivener: 74 · Joe Folley: 84. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Glen Scrivener vs Matt Dillahunty: Can Atheism Deliver a Better World? · 2020
Scrivener grounds dignity and obligation in Christianity; Dillahunty distinguishes atheism from secular humanism and advances a corrigible, human-centered moral foundation.
Glen Scrivener: 77 · Matt Dillahunty: 86. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Glen Scrivener vs Alex O'Connor: Morality, Freedom, Slavery, and the Bible · 2026
Scrivener traces Western morality through Christian narratives and institutions, while O'Connor argues that mixed traditions, material struggle, and internal counterevidence better explain it.
Glen Scrivener: 81 · Alex O'Connor: 89. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Stephen Woodford vs Glen Scrivener: Does Religion Poison Everything? · 2026
Woodford pressed doctrinal harm and non-Christian moral goods; Scrivener answered through Christian anthropology, reforming institutions, sacred equality, and nonviolent interpretation.
Stephen Woodford: 83 · Glen Scrivener: 80. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Joe Folley vs Glen Scrivener: Goodness Without God · 2025
Folley more successfully separates historical influence from necessary grounding, while Scrivener offers substantive Christian interpretations without establishing their exclusivity against non-theistic alternatives.
Joe Folley: 85 · Glen Scrivener: 76. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Michael Shermer vs Glen Scrivener — Can We Be Good Without God? · 2024
Scrivener narrowly wins by pressing universal human worth and outsider scope, while Shermer offers strong fallibilist reasons but leaves equal rights incompletely grounded.
Michael Shermer: 79 · Glen Scrivener: 82. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.