Published debate record
2 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 83/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.
William Lane Craig vs Erik Wielenberg: God and Morality · 2018
Craig defended divine nature and commands as morality’s foundation; Wielenberg answered with irreducible normativity, explanatory parity, and sharper replies on agency.
William Lane Craig: 80 · Erik Wielenberg: 84. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.
Erik Wielenberg vs Adam Lloyd Johnson — What Is the Best Account of Objective Morality? · 2020
Wielenberg’s focused parity, intrinsic-value, and obligation challenges outperformed Johnson’s theistic grounding, though Johnson pressed a serious evolutionary reliability problem.
Adam Lloyd Johnson: 71 · Erik Wielenberg: 82. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.