Slugfester

Don Loeb

Don Loeb's Slugfester profile includes score averages, opponents faced, topic performance, and linked debate scorecards.

Background

About Don Loeb

Don Loeb is a philosopher whose research focuses on the foundations of ethics. He examines moral language, moral reasoning, and debates about objective value, alongside interests in law and political philosophy.

Biographical source ↗

Published debate record

1 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 82/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.

Is Moral Realism Better Supported? Michael Huemer vs. Don Loeb · 2022

Huemer’s intuitive and convergence-based realism met Loeb’s semantic, explanatory, and practical alternatives; mixed evidence narrowly left anti-realism at least equally plausible.

Michael Huemer: 80 · Don Loeb: 82. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.

Team and other excluded appearances

These records do not contribute to individual averages.

David Enoch & Eric Sampson vs Don Loeb & Matthew Lutz: Is Moral Realism True? · 2024

Enoch and Sampson defend robust moral realism through Moorean cases and rational reflection; Loeb and Lutz argue that desire-relative reasons and a naturalistic explanation of moral experience make such facts unnecessary.

David Enoch & Eric Sampson: 92 · Don Loeb & Matthew Lutz: 91. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.