Slugfester

Dan Barker

Dan Barker's Slugfester profile includes score averages, opponents faced, topic performance, and linked debate scorecards.

Background

About Dan Barker

Dan Barker is an author, musician, and former Christian minister associated with the Freedom From Religion Foundation. His books, public debates, and broadcasts examine religious belief, morality, and meaning from an atheist perspective.

Biographical source ↗

Published debate record

7 eligible one-on-one scorecards. Average published score: 76.9/100. Scores describe these debates, not the person's overall ability or worth.

Trent Horn vs Dan Barker — Does the Christian God Exist? · 2018

Horn narrowly prevailed through stronger metaphysical replies and a resilient resurrection case, while Barker excelled on institutional accountability, scriptural morality, and textual conflict.

Trent Horn: 73 · Dan Barker: 71. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.

Matt Slick vs Dan Barker — Does God Exist? · 2014

Barker wins by controlling burdens, sharpening divine-coherence objections, and limiting prayer conclusions, while Slick raises serious grounding challenges without completing their Biblical bridge.

Matt Slick: 68 · Dan Barker: 76. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.

Dinesh D’Souza vs Dan Barker — Does God Exist? · 2009

Barker narrowly wins by sustaining evidential restraint and sharper rebuttals, while D’Souza offers a broad cumulative case weakened by several unsupported inferential bridges.

Dinesh D'Souza: 72 · Dan Barker: 76. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.

Kyle Butt vs Dan Barker — Does the God of the Bible Exist? · 2009

Dan Barker narrowly wins through stronger natural alternatives and direct corrections, while Kyle Butt delivers the best single rebuttal on testimony but leaves key biblical identification bridges unsupported.

Kyle Butt: 75 · Dan Barker: 78. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.

Adam Lloyd Johnson vs Dan Barker — Does God Exist? · 2022

Johnson narrowly wins by presenting the more integrated cumulative case, though Barker’s coherence and evidential objections substantially limit its force.

Adam Lloyd Johnson: 78 · Dan Barker: 77. Scores assess the reasoning in this debate.