<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Slugfester new debate assessments</title>
  <subtitle>Recently published transcript-grounded debate scorecards.</subtitle>
  <id>https://slugfester.com/</id>
  <link href="https://slugfester.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/>
  <link href="https://slugfester.com/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
  <updated>2026-10-09T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 308: Justin Schieber vs Randal Rauser — Religious Disagreement and God · 2017</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/schieber-rauser-religious-disagreement-2017/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/schieber-rauser-religious-disagreement-2017/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Schieber’s calibrated comparative case outscored Rauser’s thoughtful but insufficiently evidenced appeals to permissive divine reasons and underdetermination.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 307: Bart Ehrman vs James White — Does the Bible Misquote Jesus? · 2009</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/ehrman-white-bible-misquote-jesus-2009/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/ehrman-white-bible-misquote-jesus-2009/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Ehrman narrowly prevailed by proving consequential local misattributions, while White strongly defended recoverable textual and theological continuity.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 306: Stephen Meyer vs Peter Atkins — Intelligent Design and Science · 2010</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/meyer-atkins-intelligent-design-science-2010/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/meyer-atkins-intelligent-design-science-2010/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Meyer’s qualified causal and methodological case outperformed Atkins’s naturalistic objections, chiefly by sharply separating functional sequence from spontaneous order and origins from later evolution.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 305: Jonathan McLatchie vs Paulogia — Christianity’s Origins and the Resurrection · 2023</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/mclatchie-paulogia-christianity-resurrection-2023/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/mclatchie-paulogia-christianity-resurrection-2023/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-09T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>McLatchie wins narrowly by offering the more developed comparative explanation, while Paulogia exposes serious unresolved dependence on Gospel proximity, transmission, and source-specific reliability.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 304: Richard Swinburne vs Bart Ehrman — God and Suffering · 2009</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/swinburne-ehrman-god-suffering-2009/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/swinburne-ehrman-god-suffering-2009/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-08T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Ehrman’s victim-centered, natural-evil, and scriptural challenges outweighed Swinburne’s coherent but incompletely warranted account of responsible freedom, sanctity, redemption, and heaven.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 303: William Lane Craig vs Michael Nugent — Does God Exist? · 2017</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/craig-nugent-god-existence-2017/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/craig-nugent-god-existence-2017/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-08T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>A close contest in which Nugent’s method and targeted rebuttals narrowly outperformed Craig’s structured cumulative case, while both left central grounding questions unresolved.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 302: Randal Rauser vs Dan Barker — Is the Christian God Worthy of Worship? · 2020</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/rauser-barker-god-worthy-worship-2020/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/rauser-barker-god-worthy-worship-2020/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-08T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Rauser narrowly prevailed by making his Christian framework explicit and conditional, while Barker&apos;s victim-centered objections kept the central moral burden unresolved.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 301: David Wood vs Shabir Ally — Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? · 2018</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/wood-ally-resurrection-2018/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/wood-ally-resurrection-2018/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-08T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Wood’s cumulative historical case leads, while Ally’s critical challenges expose narrative tensions without establishing his conditional survival-and-ascension alternative.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 300: Daniel Dennett vs Robert Sapolsky — Do We Have Free Will? · 2023</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/dennett-sapolsky-free-will-2023/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/dennett-sapolsky-free-will-2023/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-08T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Sapolsky narrowly prevailed by pressing unchosen causal origins, while Dennett built a strong compatibilist account of evolved, reasons-responsive self-control and humane responsibility.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 299: Paulogia vs Michael Jones — Divine Hiddenness and a Perfectly Loving God · 2019</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/paulogia-jones-divine-hiddenness-2019/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/paulogia-jones-divine-hiddenness-2019/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-08T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Paulogia narrowly wins through the one-exception burden and unequal disclosure, while Jones offers calibrated psychological, public-evidence, and postmortem compatibility replies.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 298: Trent Horn vs Raphael Lataster — Does God Exist? · 2016</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/horn-lataster-god-existence-2016/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/horn-lataster-god-existence-2016/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-07T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Horn offers four converging routes to classical theism; Lataster narrowly prevails by preserving premise uncertainty, probabilistic counterevidence, and unresolved supernatural rivals.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 297: Mike Winger vs Paulogia — Evidence for the Resurrection · 2018</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/winger-paulogia-resurrection-evidence-2018/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/winger-paulogia-resurrection-evidence-2018/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-07T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Mike Winger and Paulogia dispute whether early resurrection reports, appearances, persecution, and the empty tomb make Jesus’s resurrection the best historical explanation.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 296: Matt Dillahunty vs Randal Rauser — Humanism or Christianity? · 2023</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/dillahunty-rauser-humanism-christianity-2023/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/dillahunty-rauser-humanism-christianity-2023/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-07T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Matt Dillahunty and Randal Rauser compare secular humanism and mere Christianity as practical foundations for equal worth, moral judgment, solidarity, and present human flourishing.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 295: Trent Horn vs Paulogia — Did the Apostles Die for a Lie? · 2023</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/horn-paulogia-apostolic-sincerity-2023/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/horn-paulogia-apostolic-sincerity-2023/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-07T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Horn argues that documented and foreseeable suffering supports apostolic sincerity; Paulogia answers that evidence for several named leaders cannot establish all eleven.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 294: Paul Copan vs Randal Rauser — The Canaanite Conquest and a God of Love · 2022</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/copan-rauser-canaanite-conquest-2022/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/copan-rauser-canaanite-conquest-2022/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-07T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Copan defends a historically grounded, hyperbolic conquest under exceptional divine judgment; Rauser argues that residual civilian targeting and identity destruction remain morally indefensible.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 293: Sean McDowell vs Paulogia — Apostolic Martyrdom and the Resurrection · 2020</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/mcdowell-paulogia-apostolic-martyrdom-2020/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/mcdowell-paulogia-apostolic-martyrdom-2020/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-07T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>McDowell argues costly apostolic persistence supports sincere resurrection belief, while Paulogia accepts key individuals but challenges group scope, death evidence, and the move from sincerity to truth.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 292: SJ Thomason vs Scott Clifton — Morality, Meaning and God · 2020</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/thomason-clifton-morality-meaning-god-2020/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/thomason-clifton-morality-meaning-god-2020/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-07T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Clifton’s careful separation of moral facts, duties, and finite meaning outperformed Thomason’s suggestive but under-supported appeals to transcendence and higher calling.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 291: Randal Rauser vs Justin Schieber — Does God Exist? · 2015</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/rauser-schieber-god-existence-2015/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/rauser-schieber-god-existence-2015/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-06T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Schieber’s comparative naturalist case better connects simplicity, hiddenness, cosmic hostility, and suffering to the motion, while Rauser offers serious epistemic and moral replies.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 290: Randal Rauser vs Alex Malpass — Does Suffering Provide Evidence Against Theism? · 2021</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/rauser-malpass-evidential-problem-evil-2021/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/rauser-malpass-evidential-problem-evil-2021/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-06T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Malpass argues suffering favors indifference over classical theism; Rauser concedes the bare comparison while defending richer theistic background beliefs.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 289: Erik Wielenberg vs Adam Lloyd Johnson — What Is the Best Account of Objective Morality? · 2020</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/wielenberg-johnson-objective-morality-2020/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/wielenberg-johnson-objective-morality-2020/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-06T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Wielenberg’s focused parity, intrinsic-value, and obligation challenges outperformed Johnson’s theistic grounding, though Johnson pressed a serious evolutionary reliability problem.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 288: Michael Shermer vs Luuk Vandeweghe — Are the Miracles of Jesus Unbelievable? · 2019</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/shermer-vandeweghe-jesus-miracles-2019/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/shermer-vandeweghe-jesus-miracles-2019/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-06T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Shermer wins by pressing claim-specific evidence and comparative religious testimony, while Vandeweghe offers substantive but incompletely connected historical witness arguments.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 287: Adam Lloyd Johnson vs Dan Barker — Does God Exist? · 2022</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/johnson-barker-god-existence-2022/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/johnson-barker-god-existence-2022/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-05T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Johnson narrowly wins by presenting the more integrated cumulative case, though Barker’s coherence and evidential objections substantially limit its force.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 286: Samuel Nesan vs Matt Dillahunty — Did Jesus Fulfill Prophecy? · 2021</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/nesan-dillahunty-jesus-prophecy-2021/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/nesan-dillahunty-jesus-prophecy-2021/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-05T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Dillahunty’s two-stage demand for prospective specificity and independent event evidence outweighed Nesan’s thoughtful but insufficiently constrained cumulative covenant reading.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 285: Kyle Butt vs Dan Barker — Does the God of the Bible Exist? · 2009</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/butt-barker-biblical-god-2009/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/butt-barker-biblical-god-2009/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-05T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Dan Barker narrowly wins through stronger natural alternatives and direct corrections, while Kyle Butt delivers the best single rebuttal on testimony but leaves key biblical identification bridges unsupported.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate 284: William Lane Craig vs Klemens Kappel — Does God Exist? · 2012</title>
    <id>https://slugfester.com/debate/craig-kappel-god-existence-2012/</id>
    <link href="https://slugfester.com/debate/craig-kappel-god-existence-2012/" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <updated>2026-10-04T12:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <summary>Craig’s cumulative theistic arguments face Kappel’s qualified atheism, comparative naturalism, and challenges concerning explanation, morality, testimony, and disagreement.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
