{
  "method": "Single AI-assisted editorial close reading of saved caption excerpts; purposive illustration, not blinded coding or a prevalence estimate.",
  "replies": [
    {
      "number": 308,
      "move_id": "fundamental-errors-require-correction",
      "function": "Clarify the target",
      "contribution": "Distinguishes incompatible human claims of revelation from God issuing contradictions.",
      "remaining": "Why a good God would correct this type and degree of disagreement remains to be defended."
    },
    {
      "number": 306,
      "move_id": "meyer-order-versus-functional-sequence",
      "function": "Distinguish the premise",
      "contribution": "Accepts spontaneous order, then identifies functional sequence as the phenomenon needing explanation.",
      "remaining": "Does not establish the impossibility of natural mechanisms or demonstrate design."
    },
    {
      "number": 303,
      "move_id": "foreknowledge-modal-reply",
      "function": "Challenge an inference",
      "contribution": "Separates infallible knowledge from an alleged necessity of the known act.",
      "remaining": "Leaves the other branch about creating known evildoers and broader freedom questions open."
    },
    {
      "number": 308,
      "move_id": "truth-and-interpersonal-harm-without-exclusivism",
      "function": "Limit an attributed premise",
      "contribution": "Identifies relational and interpersonal harms not requiring exclusivist salvation.",
      "remaining": "Still owes a comparison with reasons for permitting disagreement."
    },
    {
      "number": 245,
      "move_id": "concession-and-remaining-scope",
      "function": "Concede a clarified objection",
      "contribution": "Acknowledges a different conditioning of the probability example and possible force of that answer.",
      "remaining": "Does not settle other hypothetical cases or fine-tuning overall."
    },
    {
      "number": 308,
      "move_id": "mistake-accommodation-and-shared-moral-framework",
      "function": "Partial contact",
      "contribution": "Offers human error, accommodation and shared morality, but partly reanswers the already clarified revelation claim.",
      "remaining": "Needs to connect proposed goods to persistent fundamental disagreement."
    },
    {
      "number": 303,
      "move_id": "rational-committee-normativity-critique",
      "function": "Inaccurate target attribution",
      "contribution": "Calls Nugent a denier of objective values despite his explicit objective-harm proposal.",
      "remaining": "Could challenge that account's grounding without treating its stated conclusion as absent."
    },
    {
      "number": 265,
      "move_id": "option-count-depends-on-partition-granularity",
      "function": "Challenge a probability inference",
      "contribution": "Shows that the number of named possibility classes changes with grouping.",
      "remaining": "Does not itself estimate the probabilities of embodied life or naturalism."
    }
  ],
  "bridges": [
    {
      "number": 244,
      "move_id": "pro-stage-structure",
      "starting_claim": "Necessary foundation",
      "further_claim": "Perfect immaterial mind",
      "proposed_bridge": "Announces a two-stage contingency argument.",
      "remaining": "The second stage needs reasons beyond naming its conclusion."
    },
    {
      "number": 303,
      "move_id": "personal-first-cause",
      "starting_claim": "Cause of the first physical state",
      "further_claim": "Personal agency",
      "proposed_bridge": "Contrasts law-and-condition explanation with intentional explanation.",
      "remaining": "Must defend unembodied agency and the completeness of the alternative list."
    },
    {
      "number": 265,
      "move_id": "value-sensitive-theism-outpredicts-naturalism",
      "starting_claim": "Perfectly good theistic hypothesis",
      "further_claim": "Prediction of life-permitting conditions",
      "proposed_bridge": "Connects conscious/aesthetic value with divine preferences.",
      "remaining": "Needs support for probability measures and competing creation purposes."
    },
    {
      "number": 244,
      "move_id": "pro-unlimited-parsimony",
      "starting_claim": "Necessary foundation",
      "further_claim": "Unlimited perfection",
      "proposed_bridge": "Argues arbitrary limits introduce unexplained facts.",
      "remaining": "Absence of limits does not establish that each proposed property applies."
    },
    {
      "number": 244,
      "move_id": "pro-trinity-perfect-community",
      "starting_claim": "Perfect love and self-understanding",
      "further_claim": "Exactly three persons",
      "proposed_bridge": "Offers tentative community and outside-perspective analogies.",
      "remaining": "Needs exact-number support and an account consistent with omniscience."
    },
    {
      "number": 245,
      "move_id": "limited-power-and-suffering",
      "starting_claim": "Suffering and a good God",
      "further_claim": "Limited divine power",
      "proposed_bridge": "Relinquishes unrestricted power to accommodate suffering.",
      "remaining": "Needs independently motivated constraints and available alternatives."
    },
    {
      "number": 270,
      "move_id": "horn-resurrection-best-explanation",
      "starting_claim": "Generic divine cause",
      "further_claim": "Christian identification",
      "proposed_bridge": "Adds a historical resurrection argument.",
      "remaining": "Needs historical reliability, independence, rival comparison and religious identification."
    },
    {
      "number": 306,
      "move_id": "meyer-data-not-biblical-deduction",
      "starting_claim": "Biological data",
      "further_claim": "Intelligent causation, not biblical deduction",
      "proposed_bridge": "Limits the evidential basis and distinguishes implications from premises.",
      "remaining": "Needs causal support; even success would not establish a cosmic creator or a specific religion."
    }
  ]
}